




| Why David Willets is right and UCU is wrong |
|
|
| Written by Philip Salter |
| Tuesday, 27 July 2010 14:09 |
|
University College Union’s (UCU) statement that the reputation and standards at UK universities are at risk is incorrect. In the UK, the case of Buckingham – the first private university set up thirty year ago – is pertinent. Buckingham tops student satisfaction, staff student ratios and career outcomes, while their Business School was recently ranked second in the Guardian’s university guide 2011. More private universities would undoubtedly raise standards. Also, UCU’s suggestion that private universities threatens academic freedom is preposterous. The opposite is actually the case. As UCU and others have pointed out, restrictive government funding criteria increasingly threatens academic freedom. Private universities take no government money, which allows them greater freedom than universities funded by the state. |
| Introduction |
| Blogs |
| Articles & Think Pieces |
| Reports & Briefings |
| Upcoming Events |
| Events Archive |
| Videos |
"The discipine of colleges and universities is in general contrived, not for the benefit of the students, but for the interest, or more properly speaking, for the ease of the masters."
The Wealth of Nations, Book V, Ch I, Part III
"The endowments of schools and colleges have necessarily diminished more or less the necessity of application in the teachers. Their subsistence [is] altogether independent of their success and reputation in their particular professions."
The Wealth of Nations, Book V, Ch I, Part III
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK’s leading libertarian think tank. It engineers policies to increase Britain’s economic competitiveness, inject choice into public services, and create a freer, more prosperous society. For more information, click here.