| The green bait-and-switch |
 |
 |
| Written by Dr Fred Hansen | |
| Wednesday, 27 August 2008 | |
|
In the US many environmentalists are getting infected with the NIMBY-virus* as they realize the unpleasant consequences of renewable energy. New projects, such as the 240-mile transmission line through Indiana to accommodate wind farms (at a cost of $1bn), are unlikely to be completed any time soon. The reason for this is burdensome government regulation and lots of anticipated NIMBY litigation. So much for the green lobby’s urgency argument with regard to global warming: To wit, the greens are blocking the very transmission network needed for renewable electricity to move throughout the economy. The best sites for wind and solar energy happen to be in the sticks -- in the desert Southwest where sunlight is most intense for longest, or the plains where the wind blows most often….In addition to other technical problems, the transmission gap is a big reason wind only provides two-thirds of 1% of electricity generated in the U.S., and solar one-tenth of 1%. Protesters in California are blocking transmission lines between solar and geothermal fields in the Imperial Valley and Los Angeles and green lobbyists are obstructing a 150-mile link from solar panels to serve San Diego. Former Hummer addict and hastily baptized eco-warrior Arnold Schwarzenegger pointed out the obvious: It's kind of schizophrenic behavior... They say that we want renewable energy, but we don't want you to put it anywhere. Similar melodramas are playing out in Oregon, Arizona, the Dakotas, the Carolinas, Tennessee, West Virginia, northern Maine, and even upstate New York. It’s a nice irony to learn that the only people able to crush this green energy scam are the environmentalists themselves. * NIMBY = "not in my backyard" Comments (3)
...
written by Steve Giess, August 27, 2008
I wonder what the transmission losses are over these long links? Also, are they cost-effective for the power amounts being generated?
NIMBY the only objection allowed under planning appeal written by Dr Alister McFarquhar, August 27, 2008
In UK objectors to a Windfarm are foreced to be NIMBY.
They not allowed to object that there is no unbiassed evidence that WFs save CO2 when all effects are accounted Nor that WF save much fuel when conventional back up is allowed for. Different in Denmark which exports peak supply and imporst when wind dont blow Even in Denmark there is now disillusion with WF Smile!-there is 8 year delay in finding a ship to establish WF at sea so they say Sadly the next Government is full of wind on environment Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|
Subscribe to this comment's feed
About the ASI
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.Join our email list
Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here:
Those Greens who aren't actually communists, that is.