




| Protectionist rhetoric debunked |
|
|
| Written by Dr Fred Hansen | |
| Wednesday, 07 May 2008 | |
|
Progressives all over the West – and most fiercely the two Democratic presidential candidates – tend to blame globalization for everything because it's an easy escape from political accountability. Protectionist posturing and scrapping free trade agreements is suddenly all the rage. But research shows it’s not primarily globalization but the worldwide skills revolution that is driving change in the world's most important economies.
Bookmark
Comments (2)
![]()
Proctectionism causes poverty
written by Richard Calhoun, May 07, 2008
The Western Industrial countries should stop protecting their economies, in particular Agriculture which is keeping sub saharan Africa in abject poverty.
Capital? Which capital do you mean? written by Mark Wadsworth, May 08, 2008
"Capital is crossing borders worldwide"
It is time that people stopped saying this! If I sell my shares in a Malaysian tin mine for £1m and buy myself a block of flats in Nevada, how much capital has crossed a border? Answer = none. The tin mine is still in Malaysia producing tin and the block of flats is still in Nevada being rented out to Nevadans. 'Capital' in the sense of Adam Smith's 'stocks' is pretty much immobile. (Even social capital is not that mobile, very few people in % terms move abroad each year and many of those come back sooner or later). All that has happened is that ownership has changed. Somebody somewhere was more optimistic about tin mining than I am and somebody somewhere else was more pessimistic than I am about the US property market. Does this make the slightest difference to anything? At the margin, maybe yes, but basically no. Write comment
|
Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: