Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
The TV licensing stasi Print E-mail
Written by Tom Clougherty   
Saturday, 27 September 2008 06:01

There's a new billboard at the end of my road from the TV Licensing people. Printed over an aerial picture of the city are the words, "LONDON IS IN OUR DATABASE. EVADERS WILL PAY." My immediate reaction is not publishable on a family website. Just who the hell do these people think they are?

Of course, the complete illegitimacy of the licence fee itself makes the TV licensing authority's Gestapo tactics even harder to stomach. Personally, I can't see any justification for taxpayer-financed 'public service broadcasting' in an internet age, when people have vast amounts of media and information available to them at the click of a mouse. And even if I could, I'd have to say the BBC has long since ceased to provide it. Eastenders? Strictly Come Dancing? People may like this trash, sure, but we shouldn’t all be forced to foot the bill.

Anyway, via bbctvlicence.com, here's some handy advice for people dealing with the BBC's stormtroopers:

People who work for TVL/BBC have no more right to enter private residences than people selling dusters.

Without entry, TVL/BBC have no sure means of knowing whether a house has equipment set up to receive broadcasts. That is why they rely on mass mailshots, declaring messages such as, "This is your final warning". They rely on householders' own reaction to these letters, and on self-incrimination during street visits. Without YOUR co-operation, TVL/BBC is impotent.

What about search warrants? Before a search warrant can be issued, TVL/BBC must satisfy the court that they have "reasonable grounds" for believing that broadcasts are being received at the unlicenced address. The simple absence of a licence does not constitute this, nor does the householder's refusal to communicate with TVL/BBC. To obtain a search warrant, TVL/BBC must offer the court positive evidence, such as seeing or hearing a television, or the householder's own admission. Without such evidence, TVL/BBC cannot apply for a search warrant, and without a search warrant, they cannot enter. So, they are back to square one.

Comments (10)Add Comment
...
written by Brian, September 27, 2008
No, we are not quite back to square one. These individuals have committed criminal offences (harassment, demanding money with menaces, fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice would seem to be good starting points).

When are they going to be prosecuted?
How do we get the police to take action against them?
What would happen if I were to make a citizen's arrest?
...
written by tiger69, September 27, 2008
Forgive my naivity, are you suggesting that the traditional detector van is no more effective than a mobile empty baked bean can, and that defaulters' names and addresses that appear in local press are ficticious? Or are you a licensing authority plant encouraging more defaulters to generate funds to produce better quality programs (or increase salaries)than you have suggested?
...
written by TV Licensing, September 27, 2008
Even more objectionable than their billboards is the heavy handed way they treat non-TV viewers who don't require a licence. They assume anyone without a licence is an evader and they expect those people to prove their innocence.
...
written by Steve Giess, September 27, 2008
Like the ID-Card item posted above, this whole approach is something that Orwell could only dream of actually happening in 1948. Having 'won' the cold war, we are using the methods of the Stasi - I don't think Sir W. Churchill would have been pleased to see us behind the iron curtain.
Insults to our Intelligence
written by John of Enfield, September 27, 2008
I find these bureaucrats & their advertising an affront to democratic society. Can we work together to a) Stop these Orwellian insults to our British way of life. b) Stop this regressive tax which is becoming more & more irrelevant as technology develops. It will not be possible to differentiate between "Youtube" & "BBC" within what remains of my lifetime (aged 64). The license fee is already a complete anachronism.

Also please don't tell me we need the BBC to save the quality of our broadcasting.


...
written by tiger69, September 30, 2008
Hi, would the original writer please respond to my original entry of 27.09.08, my request is not to be argumentative, I ask on the basis of becoming a potential defaulter, i.e take the chance, (but don't tell anyone).

My cause for hesitation is the comment made by "tvlicensing" of 27.09.08 "They assume anyone without a licence is an evader and they expect those people to prove their innocence". This implies that this person has been through a procedure of some sort, though again by implication, with the secure proof that a license wasn't legally required.

Is the solution to simply not answer the door if the TV is on and simply reject any postal penalty on the basis of physical proof not being obtained, or indeed is their electronic evidence sufficient proof. The original writer suggests the latter is insufficient. Is it possble for him/her to point me to evidence of this?
...
written by Blog Administrator, September 30, 2008
tiger69 – as far as I know, they cannot convict you purely on the basis of 'electronic evidence', and rely on physical evidence or self-incrimination. DO NOT just take my word on this, however - I am no legal expert. Get on google and do some digging.
Mr
written by Richard, October 02, 2008
Fixed Tax - fixed taxes favour the well off and burden the least well off - yes John of Enfield a complete anachronism with no place in a modern society - better our Government set aside money each year and let the channels compete for public broadcasting money by tender each submitting it’s proposals and costs for the type of TV that apparently only the BBC can supply.

Of coarse these juicy jobs would have to go .. BBC Trust Chairman receives £140,000 pa; the Vice Chairman £75,495; the Trust members for the UK Nations £40,265; other members £35,230. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/...inted.html

I wonder if any of them actually watch TV ...
The time commitment for BBC Trust members is expected to be around 4 days a week for the Chairman; around 2.5 days for the Vice Chairman; and around 2 days a week for the other Trustees
...
written by steve69, October 02, 2008
thanks re TV lic. will investigate as you suggest, Steve
...
written by Roger Lancefield, October 09, 2008
Wonderful isn't it? We've got one of these jaw-dropping, intimidating billboards near Streatham Common. Totally out of place in a modern, supposedly consensual democracy. It lacks only a few severed few heads on pikes. One has to wonder what damage occurs to our civic society when key state institutions take such a threatening, confrontational and fear-based approach. Besides, if they really want it to be effective in Lambeth they're going to need to take a more multi-lingual approach given that there are scores of different languages spoken in the borough.

I find it astonishing that the enforcement arm of the BBC can be so (presumably willfully) insensitive at a time of heightened public concern about state surveillance and database culture, and with the "Freedom not Fear" event pending as well.

Still, at least the cowed, rain-lashed Eloi at the bus stop opposite will be in no doubt as to what will happen to them should they decline to fund the the likes of EastEnders, website fantasy football and the inflated salaries of the workers in this out-moded church.

Come back Noel Edmonds, all (well, almost all) is forgiven!

PS. On a pedantic note, that's a computer motherboard, not an aerial view of London ;)

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

rss180
facebook180
twitter180
youtube180

Join our email list

Email info@adamsmith.org if you would like to subscribe to our fortnightly e-bulletin.

Support the ASI

Enter Amount: