| Blog Review 487 |
 |
 |
| Written by Netsmith | |
| Friday, 25 January 2008 | |
|
This post contains the speech that Alistair Darling should have given. Think how his popularity would have risen if he had told the simple, plain, unadorned truth? As neat an explanation of the Law of Unintended Consequences as you are likely to see. Further discussion and what it means for policy decisions here. For example, taxes don't stay where they're put. Was that huge Soc Gen loss really caused simply by a rogue trader? Why Bill Gates' speech at Davos wasn't just simplistic, but wrong. Wrong in analysis and wrong in suggestions for policy. So why is the US Government trying to offer everyone a payday loan? And finally, why the Morning Star headlines get reviewed on the telly and which would you prefer with your New Statesman subscription? The Chavez t-shirt or the Fidel book?
Bookmark
Comments (0)
 Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|
Subscribe to this comment's feed
About the ASI
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.Join our email list
Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here:
