




| Blog Review 605 |
|
|
| Written by Netsmith |
| Thursday, 22 May 2008 15:52 |
|
If you would like to see a true outrage, a gross use of "earmarks", try this little story from the Cato Institute. Another twisting of the regulatory process: nuclear plants are not able to take part in the carbon offsets schems. Why ever not? If you would like to try something useful in cutting carbon emissions, try this contrarian list: first thing, shun organic milk. What a wonderful phrase: a derangement of legislators. Links to more comments here. How the State claims it is saving money: by moving the goalposts, of course. It simply boggles the mind that this keeps being deleted from the Guardian website. And finally, an email that never did receive an answer.
Bookmark
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.
Email info@adamsmith.org if you would like to subscribe to our fortnightly e-bulletin.