




| Five arguments against a windfall tax |
|
|
| Written by Andrew Lomas | |
| Friday, 29 August 2008 | |
|
In an interview with The Telegraph yesterday, John Hutton, the business secretary, effectively ruled out a windfall tax on energy companies. Good. I was getting thoroughly sick of the received wisdom surrounding a Windfall Tax on Oil and Gas Companies that said because the public would support it, it’d be a good idea. It wouldn’t. Rather than regurgitating Mill, talk about the tyranny of the majority, or generally waste time by going into details, here are 5 quick reasons why that Windfall Tax would have been a terrible idea:
Comments (3)
![]()
...
written by Roark, August 30, 2008
I agree and defended the oil companies here: http://vivalaliberty.blogspot....anies.html
Unfair windfall tax written by Brain Cordingley, September 09, 2008
Part of these windfall profits will effectively be taken from private pensioners and pension funds. In a sense, by applying a windfall tax the goverment would be taking money from some private pensioners. If it considers it desirable to help those in energy poverty then this money should come out of general taxation.
If the government has developed a taste for windfall taxes then I think it should also compensate shareholders who have suffered unexpected losses - recently in the banking sector for example and with earlier privatisations of British energy and Rail Track. Just dipping its hand in the till on winners and not compensating losers seems a little less than fair Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|
Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here:
I suppose the current hot air demonstrates a misunderstanding of the dfference between price and profit.