Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Bailing out Detroit Print E-mail
Written by Andrew Hutson   
Tuesday, 18 November 2008 06:03

 

According to The Economist, Detroit, the heartland of the US car industry, is currently ‘running on empty’ with GM having spent nearly $15bn of their spare capital.

The car manufacturers are claiming that $50bn of taxpayers money is needed in order to keep them afloat through troubled times. It may seem like a simple solution to numerous problems at once: such a large capital injection could support the worst affected firms and prevent unemployment rising within the area. But this is only considering the short-term goals, rather than the overall health of the economy.

By bailing out the US car industry, the government will be sending out the wrong signals to other firms: they can run inefficient business models without facing financial repercussions. Many US commentators have argued that GM would be better off filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy and fundamentally restructuring their business, and it is hard to disagree. A federal bail out only delays the inevitable.

Moreover, unemployment in Detroit is not a product of the current downturn. There has been unemployment there since the car making industry became automated. The problem of unemployment will not be solved by simply putting cash into the car producers' pockets.

More sustainable, long-term solutions are needed. The inefficiencies and failings of an industry cannot be repaired by throwing money at it. Ultimately these markets need to be freed in order to allow firms to react to such problems. For example, if the role of the unions were reduced (something which seems unlikely under an Obama presidency, it has to be said), the firms' costs could be lowered allowing them to compete with foreign manufacturers in domestic markets.

It is particularly instructive to note, as Michael E. Levine did in yesterday's Wall Street Journal, that thanks to the United Auto Workers' 'Jobs Bank' programme (which guarantees nearly full wages and benefits for workers who lose their jobs due to automation or plant closure) GM currently supports more retirees than workers. No wonder they are in such trouble.

Comments (2)Add Comment
Steady on...
written by Jabithew, November 18, 2008
You mis-represented the Economist a little there. You should make it clear that the Economist said that Detroit should be allowed to fail.
bailing out detroit
written by Russ, December 08, 2008
why bail out another ...not the americans fault they cannot make an affordable vehicle...if the bailout happens it should come with a credit for each licensed american for appx 10.000 per vehicle...and the big three need to have new mgnt and remove the ceo's..

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

rss180
facebook180
twitter180
youtube180

Join our email list

Email info@adamsmith.org if you would like to subscribe to our fortnightly e-bulletin.

Support the ASI

Enter Amount: