Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
The Equal Opportunities Commission discovers supply and demand Print E-mail
Written by Tim Worstall   
Sunday, 10 June 2007
 No, we shouldn't wonder why it took them so long, rather, we should be as the angels in heaven, joyous over the sinner that repenteth :
Research carried out by the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) shows that the proportion of female graduates in such jobs rose from 5.4% to 13.2% between 1995 and 2005, compared with a rise from 4.3% to 7.1% for male graduates.

The figures confirm that the expansion of university education in the past 20 years has significantly devalued the worth of a degree in the job market.
Now that they've discovered that supply and demand are, as the economists have been trying to point out for the past few centuries, the things that actually determine pay, can we get the very same EOC to understand a few more ideas put forward by the pointy-heads?

For example, that as part-time workers cost more to employ than full-timers, for equivalent hours worked, then the part-timers will be paid less per hour? That increasing the cost of employing women by mandating long maternity leaves will reduce the amount those women are paid? No, I'm not holding my breath for those to sink in.

As to the larger point about the benefits of education: if we are to take a strictly accounting view of the costs and benefits, we might find that higher education has expanded too far. As indeed seems to be the case :
Subject choice is crucial. Other things being equal, the rates of return to maths and computing, engineering and technological subjects and medicine (the "hard" subjects) are, unsurprisingly, robustly positive. Other choices are less remunerative and, in the case of arts degrees for men and after allowing for the new £3,000 level of tuition fees, the calculated average rate of return is actually negative.
Yes, of course, there other than strictly economic benefits to studying at university but could we at least stop justifying the expansion of the number going on those non-existent economic grounds?
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: