Earlier today in Ipswich, Prime Minister David Cameron pledged to turn Britain into a nation of “full employment”, aiming to overtake Germany for the top percentage of people in work.
From the BBC:
The PM is aiming for Britain to have the highest percentage of people in work of any developed nation.
Labour said the Conservatives’ promises would sound like “empty words” to the unemployed or those on low pay.
Mr Cameron’s goal of “full employment” would involve the UK, currently 72%, overtaking Germany’s 74% in terms of the percentage of people in work, said BBC assistant political editor Norman Smith.
There is no timescale, but it is an “aspiration which he wants to achieve”, he added.
It’s a nice ‘aspiration’ sure, but Labour’s not the only group to think these are ‘empty words’ coming from the PM.
His pledge to bring full employment to Britons includes measures to increase the number of start-up loans provided by the government, as well as plans to invest in infrastructure, which he hopes will attract business and support new apprenticeships.
But no word about changes to the minimum wage. Not a word about the personal allowance or National Insurance tax.
Research that my colleague Ben recently highlighted shows what a negative effect the minimum wage can have on unemployment – it’s estimated that “minimum wage increases reduced the national employment-to-population ratio by 0.7 percentage point(s)” in the United States during the late 2000’s.
What’s more, a job is significantly less valuable to the newly employed if she is still unable to provide for herself and her family. At the same time the PM scraps the minimum wage, he should raise the tax-free personal allowance to the Living Wage, taking the poor out of tax completely. National Insurance tax should also be scrapped for low-earners, as it works as just another form of income tax.
A backtrack on minimum wage increases combined with pegging the personal allowance and NI to a Living Wage would be a serious indication of Cameron’s commitment to ‘full employment.’ But while he continues to spout plans for increased government spending and building, I remain unconvinced.