




| Just below the surface |
|
|
| Written by Dr Eamonn Butler | |
| Friday, 25 July 2008 | |
|
Bookmark
Comments (5)
![]()
Perhaps not what it seems?
written by Paul, July 25, 2008
Would that be this comparison? http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/taxes.asp If so I wouldn't place too much weight on it.
Another debunking...
written by JA, July 25, 2008
Here's another debunking of the home sales tax claim (and other bogus claims): http://www.factcheck.org/askfa..._if_i.html
...
written by Alasdair, July 25, 2008
I'm disappointed to see the once-respected Snopes reduced to yet another Obamessiah-shill-lite group ... for those who jump to the cited entry, they see the "False" at the top ... and yet, by the end of reading the whole thing, they should instead have seen "False in places, accurate in places" - and that is what the formerly-impartial Snopes site used to do ...
I can but hope that the Snopes site hasn't realised that the entry was authored (or possibly edited) by an Obama supporter ...
...
written by Alasdair, July 26, 2008
Good to see that FactCheck.org is still trying to be fairer and more balanced ...
... written by Paul, July 28, 2008
Alasdair - I read the Snopes thing through, and I didn't see a great deal of 'accurate in places', because the hit piece isn't. I suppose that it mentions that Obama wants to tax people, which is true. But if I wrote that McCain wants to kill all Iranians it wouldn't be 'accurate in places' because he wants to kill a few Iranians, would it?
Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|
Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: