Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
The trouble with tax simplification Print E-mail
Written by Tom Clougherty   
Monday, 10 March 2008

There seems to be a consensus among economists and policy experts that the UK needs a more conservative fiscal policy. And not before time either, given that we have been operating a cyclical budget deficit for the past five or six years, despite years of uninterrupted economic growth and low unemployment. Unfortunately there is also a consensus that the state of the public finances will not allow for much radicalism.

The policy response being adopted by both opposition parties is, at a basic level, quite similar. Neither the Conservatives or the LibDems are promising up-front tax cuts, but both are committed to making the tax system simpler, fairer and flatter and to shifting the burden of taxation away from production (taxes on income and profits) towards consumption (more specifically, taxes on pollution).

As long as the proceeds of green taxes are really used to bring down taxes in other areas, I have no problem with them. All things being equal, we want to encourage production and discourage pollution, so the policy makes sense. And of course, the ASI has been campaigning for tax simplification for years, so any moves in the direction would be very welcome.

However, even simplifying taxes can turn out to be harder than expected. The trouble is that the winners from simplification tend to be ungrateful and the losers tend to be aggrieved. And if you're not cutting taxes overall there are always going to be losers from simplification. That probably means you need a very clear manifesto commitment to simpler taxes, especially if you're going to have a small majority (almost inevitable after the next election).

Another option is to introduce lower, simpler taxes through an alternative, opt-in tax system like the one advocated by Fred Thompson in his ill-fated US presidential bid. People could opt-out of PAYE and into a self-assessed flat tax system instead. Over time most people would probably opt for the simpler system, and we would end up with a much better tax system without having to fight major battles over the removal of popular complexities.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: