Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
A sensible welfare proposal Print E-mail
Written by Jason Jones   
Wednesday, 28 May 2008

The Conservative Party plans to harden the line for welfare recipients if it wins the next election by requiring any able-bodied person on welfare who is under 21 and unemployed for three months to attend an intense work-training program. It is hoped that the proposed course would improve their work discipline and teach the skills necessary to obtain work.

Even better, they plan to "ask private sector companies and voluntary organisations to run the… centres." But what if they still don’t find a job? After a year of unemployment, they’ll be required to work full-time in community programme.

This proposal should increase productivity and decrease government spending on a deadweight program. By using private companies and charities, the worker-incentive program has a much better chance of being both effective and efficient.

As the party’s welfare spokesman Chris Grayling said, "Staying at home doing nothing will be a thing of the past."

It all fits in nicely with our line on welfare reform, which you can read more about in our 2007 report, Working Welfare.
 

Comments (2)Add Comment
Dole reform?
written by Dr Dan H., May 28, 2008
The current problem with the welfare state is threefold, as I see it. The most pernicious aspect is that the taxation structure acts to trap people into dole by making it not worth their while financially to find jobs; a reform of taxation to take the lowest paid out of taxation entirely would fix that.

Secondly, modern welfare payments actually pay people to breed, and what with inherited characteristics and learned social norms, getting the people least able to survive in our society to breed like rabbits is only going to make the problem they cause worse by breeding more of them. When someone is on the dole, we should really be paying them NOT to breed.

Finally, modern dole is effectively money for nothing, and this nothing then leaves these people at a loose end all day long. This is where most of the epidemic of petty crime comes from; people with nothing to do all day. Long-term dole needs to be abolished completely in favour of Council work programmes, doing something useful but low paid such as sorting rubbish for recycling, paid by the day and only paid if the recipient actually works.
...
written by Steve Giess, May 28, 2008
I wonder how many businesses will relish taking on people who do not want to be there? I can see the high class bistro sending some oaf out to serve the food, who then drops it in the lap of the customer - consider the loss of its reputation!

We used to call it conscription, and many a general will tell you what he thinks of having conscripts compared to volunteers - not a lot.

The tax and benefit trap is real and needs removing for any progress can be made on this front; the rest just sounds like playing to the 'bullwhip' brigade audience whose predecessors in the 19th century, in their similar attitude to the Irish potato famine, bequeathed us so much grief.

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: