Head of Programmes at the Adam Smith Institute, Charlotte Bowyer, wrote for City AM on the debate regarding invasive new surveillance policies proposed by the government.
Let’s be clear: the draft Investigatory Powers Bill remains a “Snooper’s Charter”, and its proposals present a serious threat to the privacy and security of UK citizens. The bill requires internet companies to keep records of all the apps and websites a user accesses, across all devices, for an entire year.
Head of research at the ASI, Ben Southwood, wrote for Conservative Home on why a negative income tax may be the solution to Osborne's tax credit problems.
Though barely anyone predicted it at the time, George Osborne’s 2015 budget looks like it will be defined not by his vaunted hiking and rebranding of the minimum wage, but by his massive cuts to tax credits. This is because everyone has suddenly realised that these cuts will take large sums of money—thousands of pounds in many cases—out of the pockets of blue-collar and sometimes Tory-voting workers.
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare: A case for a Negative Income Tax, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits, including tax credits, into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
Ben Southwood, Head of Research at the Adam Smith Institute, has had his comments regarding the proposed tax credit cuts featured in The Week.
Some are even calling for this to be catalyst for more radical change. Writing in City AM, the Adam Smith Institute's Ben Southwood called for tax credits to be replaced by a "negative income tax""It might guarantee a monthly income of £700," Southwood writes. "For each extra £100 a person earns... they lose £50 of their initial £700 benefit. When their wages hit £700 they're getting £350 from the state, for a total of £1,050 - when their wages hit £1,400, they no longer get anything."
The latest Adam Smith Institute paper, "Free Market Welfare: The Case for a Negative Income Tax", has featured in the Financial Times.
Two free market think-tanks, the Adam Smith Institute and the Institute of Economic Affairs, argue that the entire tax credit system should be dismantled and replaced with a simple “negative income tax” — a minimum guaranteed income that tapers away as earnings rise.Sam Bowman, the Adam Smith Institute’s deputy director, argued this would “radically simplify the welfare state and guarantee that everybody is better off in work”.
The Adam Smith Institute has featured in The Times for our criticism of the proposed tax credit cuts.
The chancellor had a greater ambition in mind, to create a “lower tax, lower welfare, higher wage economy”, as he told the Commons yesterday. Few oppose the principle but when both rightwing think tanks such as the Adam Smith Institute and the unions lambast the policy for deterring work, it’s clear the delivery is flawed.
Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, Sam Bowman, was interviewed for Sky News on the proposed tax credit reforms and the ASI's new report "Free Market Welfare".
Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, Sam Bowman, discussed the ASI's latest report "Free Market Welfare: The Case for a Negative Income Tax" on LBC.
City AM wrote an article on the findings of the ASI's latest paper, "Free Market Welfare", which champions a negative income tax system as an alternative to the current tax credits scheme.
The government should replace all major welfare payments with “negative income tax”, an eyebrow-raising report from free market campaign group the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) has suggested.The radical negative income tax would pay out to British citizens in decreasing amounts until they reach a certain wage, when they would begin paying tax.
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare: A case for a Negative Income Tax, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits, including tax credits, into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, Sam Bowman, was interviewed for BBC Radio Wales on the government's proposed tax credit cuts, and argues that a negative income tax would be a better, simpler system of welfare.
In a report that we released today, we called on the government not to cut tax credits, but to simplify the system, and to simplify the benefits system in general into what some economists call a negative income tax.
Listen to the full interview here. (Starts 49:12)
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare: A case for a Negative Income Tax, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits, including tax credits, into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
The Adam Smith Institute's latest paper "Free Market Welfare: The Case for a Negative Income Tax" has been featured by the Press Association, and in over 30 local papers.
Call for Negative Income Tax as Alternative to Tax CreditsThe Government should replace tax credits and other means tested benefits with a Negative Income Tax payment that is gradually withdrawn as people's earnings increase, a new report by a think tank has suggested.
Britain’s welfare system is overcomplicated, wasteful and counterproductive. In Free Market Welfare, Michael Story makes the case for merging most working-age benefits into a Negative Income Tax – a single, tapered payment that tops up the wages of the working poor and guarantees that work always pays.
