<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Libraries, records and the state</title>
		<description>Comments for Libraries, records and the state at http://www.adamsmith.org , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.adamsmith.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:03:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/media-and-culture/libraries,-records-and-the-state-200804121203/#comment-14</link>
			<description>&quot;Without the dead hand of state bureaucracy, the whole business would be revolutionized in short order.&quot; 

Oh, I don't doubt that for a second. Nor will there EVER be a breach in their security, so that, now with no limit to records (or funds), a conniver could have unfettered access to a great many people's private information. I shouldn't even mention the chance that this private entity would sell the info wholesale, as we've seen countless times before. No, this time, no problems seen. - trog69</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:01:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>first nme basis</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/media-and-culture/libraries,-records-and-the-state-200804121203/#comment-11</link>
			<description>Dr Butler writes: &quot;Ireland is still small enough for them to feel easy calling you by your first name.&quot;  England and America are each larger still, and in each, one is increasingly addressed by one's first name quite inappropriately. Is it Ireland's small size, or it is simply filling with forward, unmannered oiks like America and England? - s j masty</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:26:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
