<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Pointless government</title>
		<description>Comments for Pointless government at http://www.adamsmith.org , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.adamsmith.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:13:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Now who is being PC ?</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/politics/pointless-government-200806291622/#comment-517</link>
			<description>Silly Craig - the male referenced is *obviously* gifted with Multiple-Personality Disorder, and is being mainstreamed into the workforce to comply with the relevant percentage of MPD-gifted people - and he only requires one paycheque, too ! - Alasdair</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:16:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Creeping Sexist Destruction Of The Language</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/politics/pointless-government-200806291622/#comment-511</link>
			<description>&quot;The male could still be hired if the employer sees their personality working better for the job.&quot;

Since we're talking about political correctness here, how about a little less in your writing.

&quot;The male could still be hired if the employer sees *his* personality working better for the job&quot;  would be more accurate and infinitely more pleasant-sounding.

I agree with the point of your post, but, please, let's not use the grotesque grammar of feminism especially when criticising it. - Craig</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:25:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
