<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Review 662</title>
		<description>Comments for Blog Review 662 at http://www.adamsmith.org , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.adamsmith.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:33:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/misc/blog-review-662-200807181730/#comment-617</link>
			<description>The few are wise to ignore climate economists. No point in view of dodgy science. Just a diversion from climate propaganda promulgated as Science.

 No evidence of a measurable effect of mans CO2 on temperature rise which precedes CO2 increase. Just contested AGW hypothesis and models not yet explained by IPCC.

Warming about 0.5 D in 20 C and cooling since 1991 on most official series however dodgy the averaging not explained. No warming in S Hemisphere. No Problem justifies no action. see

http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm

 - Dr Alister McFarquhar</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:20:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
