<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Just below the surface</title>
		<description>Comments for Just below the surface at http://www.adamsmith.org , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.adamsmith.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:11:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-and-economy/just-below-the-surface-200807251756/#comment-659</link>
			<description>Alasdair - I read the Snopes thing through, and I didn't see a great deal of 'accurate in places', because the hit piece isn't.  I suppose that it mentions that Obama wants to tax people, which is true.  But if I wrote that McCain wants to kill all Iranians it wouldn't be 'accurate in places' because he wants to kill a few Iranians, would it? - Paul</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:25:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-and-economy/just-below-the-surface-200807251756/#comment-651</link>
			<description>Good to see that FactCheck.org is still trying to be fairer and more balanced ... - Alasdair</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:13:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-and-economy/just-below-the-surface-200807251756/#comment-650</link>
			<description>I'm disappointed to see the once-respected Snopes reduced to yet another Obamessiah-shill-lite group ... for those who jump to the cited entry, they see the &quot;False&quot; at the top ... and yet, by the end of reading the whole thing, they should instead have seen &quot;False in places, accurate in places&quot; - and that is what the formerly-impartial Snopes site used to do ...  
 
I can but hope that the Snopes site hasn't realised that the entry was authored (or possibly edited) by an Obama supporter ... - Alasdair</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:50:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Another debunking...</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-and-economy/just-below-the-surface-200807251756/#comment-646</link>
			<description>Here's another debunking of the home sales tax claim (and other bogus claims): http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/would_obama_tax_my_profits_if_i.html - JA</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:51:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Perhaps not what it seems?</title>
			<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-and-economy/just-below-the-surface-200807251756/#comment-644</link>
			<description>Would that be this comparison? http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/taxes.asp  If so I wouldn't place too much weight on it. - Paul</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:11:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
