|
Written by Tom Clougherty (November 2008)
|
|
In this think piece ASI policy director Tom Clougherty outlines his reaction to the Chancellor's pre-budget report of November 2008, arguing that Alistair Darling's so-called 'stimulus package' is really a manifesto for wasteful spending, record levels of government borrowing and public debt, and higher taxes in the long term. He argues Darling should instead have announced a substantial rise in the personal allowance balanced by public spending restraint.
|
|
|
Friday, 16 November 2007 |
|
The idea of a flat rate income tax system is attractive, and the arguments in favour are well rehearsed. It is simple, transparent to the taxpayer and easy to manage, with low administrative costs; it enhances the incentive to work; if it is extended to investment income it encourages the saving and investment necessary to stimulate economic growth in a competitive global market; it attracts entrepreneurs from abroad to a business friendly environment; it provides the conditions for increased employment; counter-intuitively, and given a sufficiently generous non-taxable personal allowance, it favours the lower paid over the affluent; and it quickly leads to higher tax receipts that enable government spending elsewhere.
Flat rate income tax has existed for many years, but has only recently attracted widespread attention after its adoption, to good effect, by several East European countries. On the evidence, which is becoming extensive, there is little to object to and, yet, it is likely to be difficult to introduce such a system to the UK, principally for reasons of short-term affordability and popular perception. It is an unfortunate fact that, whilst the benefits of a flat tax have been widely discussed by a growing number of advocates, the considerable obstacles that could decisively frustrate its realisation in the UK have largely been ignored. These difficulties need properly to be exposed and addressed if flat tax is not to remain wishful thinking.
|
|
Written by Graham Cunningham
|
|
Friday, 16 November 2007 |
Seventeen years on from the political assassination of Margaret
Thatcher, her legacy seems to be an enduring transformation of our
national economic fortunes. Her political courage was the sledgehammer
that was needed to knock Britain out of its pathetic performance as a
manufacturing nation. Seventeen years of media establishment vendetta
however have sought to deny her any of the credit. This travesty of the
truth has been made possible because there is in Britain a widespread
ignorance of our economic history.
Self-delusion and decline
The hard fact is that our relative decline in manufacturing began
right back in the second half of the 19th Century, as soon in other
words, as better adapted societies like Germany and the USA began to
compete with us. It had continued relentlessly ever since. No economic
policies of either political party had ever made a jot of long-term
fundamental difference.
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 7 |