How much tax do you pay? And where does it go?
The ASI’s new tax calculator — for English taxpayers in tax year 2025/26 — tells you how much the State taxes you (directly) and what it spends it on. The tax data comes from our analysis of HMRC’s rules, updated in accordance with the November Budget, while the spending data comes from the team at wheredoesitallgo.org. Find out for yourself where your paycheque ends up and share it for all to commiserate with you on social media below.
Created by Viggo Terling
Our analysis reveals a stark truth: because England’s tax system is extraordinarily progressive, society has become heavily dependent on its wealthiest citizens to fund it.
Individuals living in the 10 wealthiest constituencies pay 158.9% more tax per resident than the median constituency, where the estimated annual tax contribution is £7,040.
In practical terms, this means the wealthiest constituencies contribute nearly 2.6 times as much tax per person as the median constituency.
The 10 wealthiest constituencies also pay tax at rates 66% higher than the poorest 10 constituencies, reflecting a substantial difference in the effective burden carried by richer areas.
These statistics demonstrate how essential high-net-worth individuals are to the sustainability of public finances. As the ASI highlighted in our Millionaire Tracker research, continuing to punish wealth creators through punitive tax policy only drives them abroad — shrinking the tax base, reducing the Government’s revenue, and placing even greater strain on already overstretched public services.
Methodology
Tax Calculator
The ASI Average Tax Calculator models how an individual’s direct taxes are calculated under the England-only 2025/26 tax code, and how those taxes flow into major areas of public spending. It deliberately excludes all indirect taxation — including VAT, excise duties, fuel duties, alcohol duties, business rates and council tax — because these taxes cannot be reliably attributed to individuals and would dilute the link between personal income and public-service funding.
1. Scope and Data Sources
All tax logic is taken directly from gov.uk / HMRC 2025/26 rules, covering, for example:
Income Tax thresholds and rates
National Insurance (Class 1 employee & employer; Class 4 for self-employment)
Personal Allowance and taper
Blind Person’s Allowance (BPA)
Marriage Allowance
High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC)
Personal Savings Allowance and Starting Rate for Savings
Dividend Allowance and rates
Capital Gains Tax (CGT)
Public spending allocations are sourced exclusively from the ASI’s Where Does It All Go? partnership, which itself draws from HM Treasury, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and official gov.uk datasets.
Revenue and expenditure for student loans, devolved governments, and public corporations have been broadly excluded because they are largely self-funding and/or consist largely of capital expenditure funded out of borrowing. These flows do not reflect annual tax-funded programme spending and cannot be meaningfully attributed to individual taxpayers.
2. Building Taxable Income
The calculator models all core direct-income components:
Employment income — taxed via Income Tax and Class 1 NI; Employer NI is calculated and can be optionally shown.
Self-employment profits — taxed through Income Tax and Class 4 NI. Class 2 NI is treated as “deemed paid” and adds no cost.
Savings and dividends — processed under PSA, the starting rate for savings, the Dividend Allowance, and the correct marginal rates.
Capital gains — CGT applied using the 2025/26 bands and annual exempt amount.
Adjusted net income is used where required (e.g. HICBC and PA taper).
3. Allowances, BPA, HICBC and Marriage Allowance
Personal Allowance (PA): full until £100,000, then tapered until extinguished at £125,140.
Blind Person’s Allowance (BPA): an extra £3,130, not tapered, and does not alter the PA taper threshold.
HICBC: applied from £60,000, fully removes Child Benefit by £80,000.
Marriage Allowance: included where applicable and used to increase the recipient partner’s PA.
Trading Allowance: for simplicity and consistency, the calculator assumes that self-employed users claim no business expenses. To avoid mis-estimating taxable profits — especially in cases where users are unsure of deductible costs—the model applies the Trading Allowance automatically.
4. Pension Contributions
Two pension mechanisms are modelled:
Employee Pension Contributions (Net Pay Arrangement)
Entered as a percentage of gross salary
Reduce taxable income before Income Tax
Do not reduce NI
Apply to employment income only
Pension via Salary Sacrifice
Contractual reduction of salary
Reduces taxable pay, employee NI, employer NI, and adjusted net income
Assumed fully HMRC-compliant
No other pension reliefs are modelled.
5. Tax Calculation and AETR
The Average Effective Tax Rate (AETR) is: Total Direct Tax / Gross Personal Income
Employer NI is included only when toggled.
Indirect taxes remain wholly excluded.
6. Spending Allocation
Total direct tax is mapped to spending categories using fixed proportions from the Where Does It All Go? dataset.
For simplicity the calculator’s infographic groups expenditure into three pillars:
Welfare
Health
Education
Constituency Outcomes
This analysis uses constituency-level estimates of annual tax paid and annualised income based on ONS data.
Effective tax rates were calculated as:
Effective Tax Rate = Annual Tax / Annual Income
Three groups were identified:
Top 10 constituencies: highest annual tax per resident (mean = £18,223.40; tax rate = 26.51%).
Median constituency: annual tax per resident = £7,040; tax rate = 18.67%.
Bottom 10 constituencies: lowest effective tax rates (mean = 16.00%).
Percentage differences in tax paid were calculated using:
(Top 10 Mean − Median) / Median × 100
yielding 158.9%, meaning the wealthiest constituencies pay 2.6 times as much tax per resident as the median:
18,223.40 / 7,040 = 2.589
Differences in effective tax rates were calculated using:
(26.51 − 16.00) / 16.00 × 100
showing that the richest constituencies pay tax at 66% higher rates than the poorest, while the poorest pay rates around 40% lower than the richest.
All comparisons reflect per-resident averages, demonstrating the degree of progressivity in England’s tax system.